Note:  What is shown below is a copy of the original letter, made for this website.  It is included here only so that the contents of the original letter can be searchable.  (The PDF received from the City is in the form of an image, and so is not a searchable document.)

What is below is not the letter sent by the letter-writer. It will contain typographical errors and other departures from the original.  The PDF displayed above is accurate.  The text below is not accurate.  It is printed here for indexing purposes, so that each word can be indexed and included in the search.

To the Planning Commission:
I cannot attend the upcoming Gateway meeting this Thursday so am submitting my input this way.
I am an Arcata resident, living adjacent to the Gateway area. While I am aware that there are issues that need to be addressed to ensure that the Gateway is done well (sea level rise questions, fire preparedness, etc), I strongly believe that these issues can be addressed/resolved and that the advantages outweigh the concerns.

The “pros” of the Gateway are clear. It addresses the desperate need for housing for varied incomes with an infill approach which helps mitigate climate catastrophe. We are rapidly running out of time on climate and need to do all we can locally.
We live in a unique and wonderful small town. I understand the resistance to change and development. But we have an ethical obligation to share this place with others who do not yet have education and/or housing. We have an ethical obligation to fight the climate emergency.
The fire department report tells me that we are not prepared for fire for many existing structures. That needs to be addressed. So as a community, let’s figure that out and proceed with the Gateway. Thank you.
Cathy Chandler-Klein