Matt Simmons – August 2, 2022 – to the Transportation Safety Committee

    0
    318

    Loading

       

     

    Note:  What is shown below is a copy of the original letter, made for this website.  It is included here only so that the contents of the original letter can be searchable.  (The PDF received from the City is in the form of an image, and so is not a searchable document.)

    What is below is not the letter sent by the letter-writer. It will contain typographical errors and other departures from the original.  The PDF displayed above is accurate.  The text below is not accurate.  It is printed here for indexing purposes, so that each word can be indexed and included in the search.


    Hello Arcata Staff,
    Can you please forward these comments to the Transportation Safety Committee.
    Thank you,
    Matt Simmons
    Redwood Coalition for Climate and Environmental Responsibility
    ***
    Dear members of the Transportation Safety Committee,
    I had hoped I would be able to attend tonight’s meeting but a last minute conflict may keep me
    from doing so. So, I am writing to express the Redwood Coalition for Climate and
    Environmental Responsibility (RCCER’s) opinions on the Gateway Plan’s Circulation and
    Infrastructure Chapters.
    First, let me say thank you for your consideration of these issues. The Gateway Plan will bring
    significant but much needed changes to Arcata. As a resident of Arcata, I am incredibly
    excited for many of these changes because they will allow more Arcatans to live a car-free,
    low carbon life. And will help make Arcata accessible to those who do not or cannot drive a
    car.
    One of the changes that has gotten the most attention from members of the community is the proposed L/K street couplet with some members of the community concerned that this would add traffic to L Street.
    RCCER supports this change however and I wanted to let you know why.
    First, this change will allow K street to become 1 lane with significant bike and pedestrian
    safety improvements. Currently, K street is a road that people drive down very fast and with traffic coming both ways. As a pedestrian and while on my bike I have felt unsafe crossing K street. Making the street 1 way, with bike and pedestrian improvements, will vastly improve the safety there. Not only for new Gateway Residents but also for all current residents in Arcata.
    Second, the proposal will turn the L street trail into a continuous buffered path. This will
    actually make the L street trail and those who use it much safer than they currently are as the trail currently shares space with the road in many places (e.g., between 10th and 11th St and north of 12th St).
    Third, the proposal will not add new vehicular capacity because the switch to a 1 way on K
    street balances out the new vehicle capacity on L street.
    All of that said, we would also support an alternative proposal – for example, a J/K Street
    single-lane couplet – which is feasible and would accomplish the same goals. However, we
    would not support alternatives that do not allow K Street to be narrowed and improved with
    bike/ped safety features, that do not improve the area’s overall walkability and bikeability, or
    that add substantial vehicular capacity to the streets.
    Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing your deliberations and decisions.
    Best,
    Matt Simmons
    RCCER